Allison Palmer

Dr. Foss

English 384-02

30 April 2020

Labeling Autism

The world consists of labels, whether on products or regarding people. Human beings create labels to identify things or create their own identification of other people. However, labeling other people can lead to misinterpretations of someone, offending someone, and is simply morally inappropriate. Labels are more often than not are inaccurate and create a misrepresentation of that person being labeled as well as offend them since they are usually negative. No matter what, labeling someone is usually morally wrong because it puts someone into a small box limited by that label and can tear someone down.There is a negative association already when it comes to Autism, however then non-autistic people label autistic individuals, enhancing the negativity surrounding Autism. The labels are inaccurate, inappropriate, and hurtful; they also place people with autism into a small group and definition about who they are.  Tito Rajarshi Mukhopadhyay’s poem “Misfit” and Craig Romkema’s “Perspectives” mention being labeled by people regarding their Autism and the negative feelings tied to those labels. This paper will analyze how non-autistic people label people with autism, misinterpretations of Autism and how it impacts Autistic people, as well as the connotations involving Autism. Mukhopadhyay, Romkema and even Jim Sinclair’s “Don’t Mourn Us” alludes to the impact labels have on these individuals and how they should simply be treated and viewed as a human being because that is who they are. 

Craig Romkema’s “Perspectives” is a poem that includes an autistic speaker who goes through his life facing being studied, labeled and intentionally omitted. Romkema shows the speaker being “diagnosed” or “helped” when the “Psychologists used to blame it on “refrigerator mothers”, Optometrists prescribe special exercises and glasses, Researchers recommend vitamin A.” He highlights the idea that doctors, or just people in general attempt to blame or find a way to “fix” autistic individuals as if it is this terrible thing that was caused by something terrible and needs to go away simply because they are unique. Some people are uncomfortable with anything that is not similar to themselves and they are afraid of anything that slightly differs, therefore, they think that it is an issue that needs a cure. When in reality it is simply who someone is, Sinclair addresses this in “Don’t Mourn For Us” when he says “Autism isn’t something a person has, or a “shell” that a person is trapped inside.” It is not something someone is stuck with or something that covers up someone’s “normalcy”, it is who they are and it does not need to be cured. 

The poetic speaker in Romkema’s poem has labels placed upon him by non-autistic people and indicates how he feels regarding the labels; these moments of labels and his perspective is relevant to how other autistic people are labeled. In a moment he mentions how some do not acknowledge his ability and ignore the fact that he understands them “So freely did they label me retarded. Or some other variant, equally untrue.” They made a quick judgment about his abilities and attempting to create him as an outcast by devaluing his abilities and pretending he could not understand. Then similarly how they made a judgment based on his abilities they labeled him a degrading, inappropriate, inaccurate and negative word in order to devalue him even farther. This is how autistic individuals are labeled everyday, with negative terms that devalue their abilities and them as people. Some people label people with autism because they like to have the upper hand on others, especially people with disabilities who they see as easy targets in taking their power; they are ignorant and are power hungry. However, Romkema even states how inaccurate these various labels are because they are simply judgments to knock autistic individuals down to a powerless position; they do not define who they are as individuals and are not even close to the truth. 

The speaker grows towards the end of the poem and gains ownership over who he is despite the labels placed upon him his entire life. Romkema states that he is “Not startlingly different in appearance or habits from that little boy so willingly labeled.” He is still outwardly similar to the little boy who was mislabeled except now he can participate in discussion posts, vote, and share his opinions. He rises above those labels with his voice and he owns who he is, showing that he is more than he appears and labeled to be. He states “now my mind is free ”, he is finally free of the labels because of his abilities and the voice he has to share his story and the accuracy. The suggestion of being free suggests the freedom autistic individuals lack due to the labels they are given because they are not free to be themselves because someone else is deciding who they are. The poem also suggests that one way to reach freedom is to own their voice and own who they are.

Mukhopadhyay’s “Misfit” and Romkema’s “Perspectives” parallel each other through the poetic speaker being an autistic individual who gets labeled and in the end there is a deeper realization. The speaker notices birds and how they knew he was “Autistic; they found no wrong with anything.” The birds knew who he was and they did not label him, try to define him, or find anything wrong, because nothing is wrong. Yet non-autistic “men and women stared at [him] nodding; they labeled [him] a Misfit(a misfit turning and turning)”; They were quick to notice something that they define as “abnormal” only because they were ignorant and labeling him misfit which means someone or something that is set apart from the others. Similar to how many label autistic individuals as misfit or abnormal or retarded or strange, they attempt to set him apart from everyone else and determine an identity for him which is that he does not belong. They labeled him a Misfit who was turning and turning, however he states “why stop turning and turning when right can be found with everything?” This final realization shows that though he may be turning and turning, that is who he is, not a misfit; he enjoys turning and turning so why stop based on someone’s opinion of him that is wrong. He realizes that just because some people want to try and find things that are wrong in the world, does not mean there are things wrong and does not mean he is wrong; a person cannot be wrong. Therefore, he is free to turn and turn because that is who he is and he enjoys it; nobody can control what someone can do, who they are because of how they want to label them.

 In the end of the poem the speaker owns who he is, he knows he is autistic and he knows people are going to label him or autistic people in general, but that does not stop him from being who he is because he is a human and is right. Autistic individuals are labeled by people who do not understand who they are and they are aware of these labels, the inaccuracy, the hurtfulness, however, they still own who they are, their abilities and create their own definition of themselves because that is their right as people.

Work Cited

Mukhopadhyay, Tito Rajarshi. Misfit.

Romkema, Craig. Perspectives.

Sinclair, Jim. “DON’T MOURN FOR US.” Don’t Mourn For Us, www.autreat.com/dont_mourn.html.

“I pledge…” Allison Palmer

Word Count 1216

Final for Amy Rouse; “Label Breaking on Autistic Abilities”

Amy Rouse

04/17/2020

Prof. Foss

Final Paper

Label Breaking on Autistic Abilities

Labels can put pressure on people to either outperform or underperform. With this pressure on those with autism there is a predominant focus on what they can’t do, and how autism has taken away and hidden a child under its grasp. The act of being labeled autistic; might provide slight relief to the parents, but also leaves them wondering who their child is without the autism, how might they form a connection with this child stereotyped to be connectionless? Autism didn’t take away a child, it gave you a unique child who is fully capable of connections, identifying with others, understanding what is being said to them, defying odds. That is an autistic child. 

These connections and accounts are found in Ralph James Savareses’ “Prologue: River of Words, Raft of Our Conjoined Neurologist” from See It Feelingly, in “Perspectives” a poem by Craig Romkema from his collection of poems titled “Embracing the Sky: Poems Beyond Disability,” and Troubleshooting by Selene dePackh. All show those with a diagnosis of autism and call attention to what others think they can’t do while showing that the individuals mentioned can do those things and many more. Here, we will see these stereotypes that are forced upon autistics but also, how they are defying expectations and changing those stereotypes.

Having feelings such as empathy is presumed to be missing from those diagnosed with autism. Savarese shows us with his autistic and nonverbal son, DJ, that feelings and identification are possible for autistic individuals. His son feels “‘character’s feelings”’ so much so that he physically shows them which can be heavy breathing that the character themselves was perceived to be doing within the story, (Savarese, pg. 15). Identification is also mentioned for those with autism as being difficult and absent from them, but DJ “morphs into [Harriet Tubman], so she morphs into him,” (Savarese, pg. 16). Being able to put yourself in someone else’s shoes and feel what they were or might have been at that moment, is a skill to be appreciated and applauded, not one to be ignored because the individual themselves is non-verbal and is assumed to not understand. 

Deficits in emotions are a portion of the DSM-5 diagnosis for autism, but what about those who feel sorrow, who have empathy? DJ is one of them, he does feel emotion so much that he is “ so attuned to the pain that it becomes his own,” (Savarese, pg. 18). Thoughts and opinions on what an autistic can’t do are summed up into broad categories in the DSM, but here we have a child who is not fully categorized within the autism diagnosis aside from his nonverbal form of communication and not wanting physical affection. There is a note made about these “prevailing stereotypes” concerning autism and emotions specifically, (Savarese, pg. 18). With a glimpse into DJs mind, we see how society has made him think of himself. For his graduation, he wanted to walk on stage and shake the Principal’s hand without flapping his arms, though he did not succeed, he “felt proud. I looked great and autistic at the same time. I realized in my own life something I had begun to learn from the books I was reading; simply conforming to the dominant culture is not always a worthy goal,”’ (Savarese, pg. 21-22). Many focus on the negatives and the so-called disruptive behavior that those with autism can perform, but why can’t they focus on the fact they just graduated? Through Savarese and his son, we see how stereotypes are demolished and outperformed, while also embracing who one is and being proud of it and letting the world see that. 

In his poem “Perspectives,” Romkema hints upon the fact that those around him can fix him with “vitamin A” and by “measuring [his] head,” (Romkema). Everyone is always insistent on finding a cure for autism, but no one is taking time to notice what is actually going on in their heads. The label of autism is “freely” made and leaves parents “telling [him] always they knew [he] was there / Inside / And somehow we would find each other, / Connect / The way they could with the sisters and brother,” (Romkema). This embarks on the fact that many perceive those with autism as being disconnected from everyone, from the world and having to provide self-stimulation which can result in arm flapping and sometimes destructive self-harmful behaviors. Romkema calls attention to many stereotypes of autistics while also showing how they become more than those stereotypes and are not limited to them. He notes, “From that little boy so willingly labeled. / But now I can type thoughts, questions, / Responses, / Enter discussions on Shakespeare and / Algebra,” among other mentionings of voting and giving his own opinions not monitored or given for him, (Romkema). Those with autism are able to speak for themselves and prove they can  on a daily basis whether they are deemed verbal or non-verbal. 

Romkema himself is autistic but also has cerebral palsy, which can now explain to the readers why he was lying in his bed and other lines of his poem concerning his body. Connection, thoughts, and other daily actions that neurotypical individuals do look different on an autistic individual, and there is nothing wrong with this. While Romkema’s poem hits a few of these stereotypes, it showcases the brilliance of how someone with autism, laying in their bed doing what other may call “self-stimulation” but actually may be “ponder[ing] new theories while / watching [his] fingers, / Doing Nothing,” (Romkema). “Perspectives” truly gives us a new and recurring perspective: that of the parents, the doctors and other professionals, but also the individual labeled with the diagnosis. He “understood every word” those around him were saying, disproving another stereotype (Romkema). While stereotypes are disproven throughout the poem, it is seen how he can do everything a neurotypical child would be able to do, only in different ways that are not mentioned but can be assumed. 

In the beginning pages of dePackhs book Troubleshooting, a patient is introduced with her ability to look in someone’s eyes instead of looking away. “I’m autistic, but I don’t look down and away like a good autistic; I stare. That complicated my diagnosis for the early years of my life,” (dePackh, pg. 2). Here, we have a very predominant example of focusing on what autistics shouldn’t be able to do, but we also have the example and label of a ‘good’ autistic, one who complies with the diagnosis standards. A whole diagnosis depends on deficits in the individuals, in this case, a deficit on eye contact was not there. This complicated a diagnosis that is plastered with aspects that an autistic individual shouldn’t be able to do. So shouldn’t it be said that she defied the odds, surpassed the expectations, derailed the label she was given? A label she had both physically and metaphorically tattooed on her, was enough for people to assume she couldn’t and should be able to do certain things. “I went up and introduced myself even though making social,” is something she would rather avoid, she does not shy away from things as it would be stereotyped (dePackh, pg. 3). Social situations are often avoided by those with autism, as would be assumed and is in the DSM-5 as a part of the diagnosis.

One very specific notion that is focused on in this first chapter consists of the tone of voice and connecting it to words and their meanings and how they become “callibr[ated]” to where it doesn’t take as long as her normal “‘auditory processing lag,’’’ (dePackh, pg. 7). Not only does this call attention to what is going on inside the brain of someone diagnosed with autism, it shows the readers the difference but the same way everyone understands words. It is like learning something new for a neurotypical individual, sometimes we get it if we have background knowledge (calibration) and sometimes it takes longer to be fully understood, so “taking the scenic route,” (dePackh, pg. 7). Her lag would be something the doctors, teachers, and others would focus on and try to rid her of and cure it, as it is noted later in the chapter in a high functioning autism classroom but also her own mother is trying to cure her autism and “cleanse” her from it, (dePackh, pg. 17). Focusing on her lag proves the point that the negatives and deficits a child may have with autism, is only part of who they are. Positives should be focused on instead because they, just like neurotypical children, can do so much more than they are perceived to. dePackh illustrates this from the few examples covered. Having a connection with your child despite the fact they may be unable to make one, depends also on the parents as well. 

Common perceptions of autism include those that diminish the ability of these individuals. The literary works written by Savarses, Romkema, and dePackh prove that stereotypes put pressure on their children, others, and themselves, but these deficits that appear are solely focused on. There is never an article saying all the things that those with autism can do, only what they can’t do in order to get a diagnosis for their child. Autism presents itself in many ways, and that may be nonverbal but it can also be to look and stare into someone else’s face and be included in social interaction. The analysis offered here in this paper shows that autism is thought of as deficits, but those deficits are being disproved by those diagnosed. 

Word Count; 1,594

I pledge,

Amy Rouse

Works Cited

Depackh, Selene. Troubleshooting: Book One, Glitch in the System. 1st ed., Reclamation Press, 2018.

Romkema, Craig. “Perspectives.” Embracing the Sky: Poems Beyond Disability, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2002.

Savarese, Ralph James. “Prologue: River of Words, Raft of Our Conjoined Neurologies .” Seeing It Feelingly, 1st ed., Duke University Press, 2018, pp. 15–22.

css.php