Shelby and Libby’s Analysis of the Representation of Disability in the First Season of Glee

Libby Wruck & Shelby Steele

ENGL 384-01

Foss

April 27, 2020

Disability Representation in Glee

Since the start of media such as television shows and movies, the representation of disability has been few and far between. Many shows and movies would implement disabled characters, played by able-bodied actors, as side characters used to develop the main characters into better people. When Ryan Murphy’s musical tv show, Glee, came out in 2009, it was seen as “woke” or socially aware. It had a wide range of characters shows typically did not have during this time. Characters with physical or mental disabilities, characters part of the LGBTQ+ community, and many people of color. Despite the impression this show gave off, Glee used disabled characters, such as Artie, who is in a wheelchair, Emma, who has OCD, Tina, who has anxiety and a stutter, and a deaf high school choir, to further the able-bodied characters and to push forward a “woke” narrative without giving disabled characters real representation.

In Simi Linton’s piece, “Reassigning Meaning” she speaks of the overcoming and passing issue. This occurs in real-life and in fictional media. While the New Directions, the glee club in Glee, is all about embracing who you are, they also often speak of all the disabled characters as “overcoming” or the other characters as trying to help the disabled ones “try to overcome” it. Artie is often told he has “overcome” his disability because he knows how to get around the school in his wheelchair without problems, and embraces his chair. Throughout the entirety of the show, Will, the glee club teacher, tells Emma he will help her to “overcome” her OCD, and even tells her he will do what he can to “fix” her. 

Artie is a great character to contrast with Yessenia from Good Kings Bad Kings. Both are wheelchair bound high schoolers and yet their representation is vastly different. Yessenia never views herself as lesser, she views the able-bodied society as the only thing holding her back. Within the first three pages of the book she gets into a fist fight with another wheelchair bound girl(3). This is a great example of Yessenia not allowing anything to hold her back and having agency in her story. Artie on the other hand is only used in the first season of the show to talk about being disabled and make the other characters better through how they treat him. Finn, the main jock, shows he’s been changed by the glee club when he stops his fellow jock friends from bullying Artie. The scene focuses on how much Finn has changed, not how Artie must be feeling. Good Kings Bad Kings ends with Yessenia tying herself to a try to protest her mistreatment while Artie doesn’t even get any sort of solo in the sections performance. He is forced into a passive role despite being on the first and most loyal members of the club.

Fox Network’s Glee ran for a total of seven years with six seasons. It was wildly popular and only recently have people started to come out and address all the problems they have with the show. It is important for the past viewers to understand the treatment of these characters and how it was wrong because this show was so big and was said to be socially aware, watching it as a child puts a stigma in one’s brain that this show was ‘okay’ and there was nothing wrong. It was truly a show of the late 2000’s that would never air the same way today, as people become more politically correct in speech and expression.

Word Count: 606

We pledge, Shelby Steele and Libby Wruck

Elizabeth Wruck’s analysis of pg 60-142 of Good Kings Bad Kings

Trigger warning: Sexual assault

The second section of the reading starts with Ricky talking about sex and locker room talks. Another houseparent, Jerry, makes him uncomfortable with how aggressive his comments are. He ends his section saying “I never told her about Jerry the sex fiend. It’s probably no big deal. Guys like that are all talk for the most part.”(63) In the next section, Mia reveals that Jerry has been sneaking into her room and raping her.

Nussbaum is exposing the reader to the reality of how terribly people can be treated in care facilities, the environment is the perfect hunting ground for predators like Jerry. There are warning signs that something is wrong with Mia; Jimmie finds her bleeding when she already had her period recently, she is constantly tired, and she’s cutting herself off from those she’s closest too. However, no one notices or is trained to notice those warning signs. 

Jerry tells Mia “He say nobody gonna belief me. They never belief me”(66) and there is sadly truth to that. A child died there with no real investigation, and no one even believes that Mia needs a powerchair. Jerry is given the benefit of the doubt for his creepy and inappropriate behavior because guys like that are thought to be harmless. There is no protection for these children, there is more protection around who gets to use the elevator. These fake safety guidelines highlight that the ILLC is more concerned with protecting themselves from lawsuits than they are with protecting the kids from predators. 

I believe that this was incredibly important to add to the story because these are still issues that disabled people face today. Even if it’s not as extreme as sexual assault(though that still happens) institutions still don’t take proper care of the people in their charges. Rather than sending students to a nurse when they act out because of a medical issue they are sent to the time out room out of spite. The teacher even encourages Ricky to leave the kid alone (which is illegal). 

Even the title ‘Good Kings Bad Kings’ is in reference to a case surrounding the death of a disabled kid on a bus who was held down by only one aide and eventually suffocated. The aide said to the kid before he died “I can be a good king or I can be a bad king”. Many of the aids in this story view themselves as kings ruling over these kids when they are really hired to serve them and their needs. The ILLC is already understaffed and funded and yet they keep trying to cut costs and add kids to beds. The for-profit is not working when it comes to long term care, especially when the children aren’t taught independence or money management. In the end, most of them are on track to be shipped from one facility to the next, never given the opportunity to become independent.

I hereby declare upon my word of honor that I have neither given nor received unauthorized help on this work. Elizabeth Wruck

css.php